Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Rapid Response account results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 68.3% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,095 of 28,364 speakers). This White House Rapid Response account is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
White House Rapid Response account
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 68.3%68.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.7%31.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 68.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos