Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wendy Hausman results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 58.1% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 127 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,374 of 28,364 speakers). This Wendy Hausman is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Wendy Hausman
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.9% percentile
42.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.9%20.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos