Speaker summary
88%1 analyzed article/video14 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Welty results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 14 faulty-reasoning hits from 14 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,827 of 37,368 speakers). This Welty is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Welty
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
85%Welty (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 14
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510084.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos14 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos