Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wells Fargo analyst Aaron Rakers results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Middle Ground, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 78.9% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 374 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 69.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,921 of 28,364 speakers). This Wells Fargo analyst Aaron Rakers is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Wells Fargo analyst Aaron Rakers
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
69.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 78.9%78.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 78.9%78.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 78.9%78.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 78.9%78.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 78.9%78.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 78.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 78.9%, sitewide 5.3%Middle Ground: Speaker 78.9%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 78.9%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 78.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos