Speaker summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 141.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weinstock results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon , Indoctrination , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.4% saturation with 74.086 hits . Analysis detected 371.012 faulty-reasoning hits from 141.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.9% and a BS Rank of 25% (21,528 of 28,364 speakers). This Weinstock is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group. Weinstock
Speaker details
Total words: 141.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.1% percentile 15.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos141.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 52.4% 52.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 26.0% 26.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 19.9% 19.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 18.0% 18.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.4%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Bandwagon: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst