Speaker summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wei Chen results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 75.6% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 212.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 71.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,743 of 28,364 speakers). This Wei Chen is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Wei Chen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
71.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 87.2%87.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 75.6%75.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 87.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 75.6%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos