Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WB Yeats results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,090 of 28,364 speakers). This WB Yeats is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
WB Yeats
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos