Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video24.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ward Boston results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 91.1% saturation with 23.223 hits. Analysis detected 74.223 faulty-reasoning hits from 24.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,999 of 28,364 speakers). This Ward Boston is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Ward Boston
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 24.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.9% percentile
68.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos24.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 82.1%82.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 91.1%91.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 82.1%82.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 91.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 82.1%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 82.1%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos