Speaker summary
73% 5 analyzed articles/videos 672.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wall Street Journal editorial board results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 53.6% saturation with 678 hits . Analysis detected 3,658.297 faulty-reasoning hits from 672.333 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of 14% (24,490 of 28,364 speakers). This Wall Street Journal editorial board is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Wall Street Journal editorial board
Speaker details
Total words: 672.333
Content count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 11.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos672.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 53.5% 53.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 32.7% 32.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 30.2% 30.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 21.8% 21.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 18.3% 18.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 28.6% 28.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 26.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst