Speaker summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos76.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vladimir Lenin results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 129 faulty-reasoning hits from 76.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,583 of 28,364 speakers). This Vladimir Lenin is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Vladimir Lenin
Speaker details
Total words: 76.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
33.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos76.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.9%21.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos