Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vision Zero results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,077 of 28,364 speakers). This Vision Zero is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Vision Zero
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 34.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos