Speaker summary
ā 52%1 analyzed article/video261.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia Chamlee results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 524 faulty-reasoning hits from 261.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.1% and a BS Rank of ā 14% (24,419 of 28,364 speakers). This Virginia Chamlee is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Virginia Chamlee
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 14%Virginia Chamlee (selected)12%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 261.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510013.9% percentile
11.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos261.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.2%26.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Middle Ground: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos