Speaker summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos221.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vince Fong results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 71.7% saturation with 184.194 hits. Analysis detected 1,351.196 faulty-reasoning hits from 221.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,801 of 28,364 speakers). This Vince Fong is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Vince Fong
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 221.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
25.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos221.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 71.7%71.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 66.2%66.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 41.6%41.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 51.2%51.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 71.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 66.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 51.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 41.6%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos