Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video85.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vidhya Ramalingam results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 63.2% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 327 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,195 of 27,710 speakers). This Vidhya Ramalingam is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Vidhya Ramalingam
Speaker details
Total words: 85.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 63.2%63.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 18.4%18.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 63.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos