Speaker summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 90.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Miranda results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 49.521 hits . Analysis detected 230.957 faulty-reasoning hits from 90.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19% and a BS Rank of 31% (20,097 of 28,877 speakers). This Victoria Miranda is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Victoria Miranda
Speaker details
Total words: 90.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.4% percentile 19.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos90.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 37.0% 37.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 44.0% 44.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 17.4% 17.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 23.2% 23.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 16.8% 16.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 22.5% 22.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst