Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video351.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Gordon results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 259.8 faulty-reasoning hits from 351.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,176 of 28,364 speakers). This Victoria Gordon is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Victoria Gordon
Speaker details
Total words: 351.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos351.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos