Speaker summary
⁠42%3 analyzed articles/videos275.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Beckham results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 405.054 faulty-reasoning hits from 275.667 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 13.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,225 of 28,364 speakers). This Victoria Beckham is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Victoria Beckham
Speaker details
Total words: 275.667
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.1% percentile
13.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos275.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.3%25.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Primacy Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos