Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos159.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victor Vieth results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 265 faulty-reasoning hits from 159.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,943 of 28,364 speakers). This Victor Vieth is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Victor Vieth
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 159.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
20.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos159.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.3%20.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos