Lawmaker Calls for Stronger Mandatory Reporting Rules Following Our Investigation Into Church Abuse Case 25%

By Andy Mannix0% Jeremy Kohler33% Leila Navidi0%

12/23/2025, 10:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 2,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,247 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.4% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,431 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the article peer group.

A Minnesota senator wants to strengthen state laws meant to hold adults entrusted with children’s safety accountable for failing to report suspected child abuse, after an investigation by the Minnesota Star Tribune and ProPublica found that the leadership of a church in Duluth for years protected a child sex predator. 
Sen. 
Erin Maye Quade, a member of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party from suburban Minneapolis, said she’s focused on situations where such an adult has concrete knowledge that a specific person is abusing children and nonetheless stays silent, allowing the abuse to continue. 
“If you know an adult who is committing child sexual abuse, you need to report that,” she said. 
“For that, the penalties could be a lot higher.” 
The Star Tribune-ProPublica report found that preachers in Duluth’s Old Apostolic Lutheran Church knew for years about allegations that a member, Clint Massie, had been sexually abusing young girls in the congregation. 
Instead of reporting it to police, church leaders encouraged some of the victims to take part in sessions where they were pressured to forgive Massie. 
They were then told never to speak of the abuse. 
In one case, preacher Daryl Bruckelmyer facilitated a meeting with Massie and a young girl, still in the first years of grade school, in his business office. 
The girl had recently told her parents that Massie groped under her shirt and touched her genitals, according to her account of the incident to investigators 15 years later. 
In front of the girl, her father and Bruckelmyer, Massie asked her for forgiveness, she told law enforcement. 
Then the girl’s dad and preacher allowed Massie, who had been sexually abusing her since kindergarten, to hug her. 
Massie, now 50, pleaded guilty last year to four counts of felony criminal sexual conduct with victims under the age of 13 related to abusing girls in the church. 
In March, a judge sentenced him to 7 1/2 years in prison. 
Bruckelmyer declined to comment, but a spokesperson for the church has said that its preachers followed the law in the Massie case. 
In interviews with police, Bruckelmyer said that the church encouraged victims to go to police but that ultimately it was up to them to do that. 
Under Minnesota law, mandatory reporters  including clergy, doctors, teachers and day care providers  can already be charged with a misdemeanor if they do not make a report to authorities when they believe a child has been maltreated within the past three years. 
Some legal experts said the criminal statute has proved an ineffective mechanism for holding accountable people who violate it. 
Out of 28 people who have been charged with violating the statute over the past 15 years, only six have been convicted, according to data reviewed by the Star Tribune and ProPublica. 
All but one resulted in probation, suspended jail sentences or options to perform community service and fines of $85 to $385. 
What’s more, Minnesota courts have repeatedly blocked lawsuits from people who’ve tried to pursue damage claims from adults or institutions that stayed silent. 
In one key 2007 case, the state Supreme Court said that even if mandatory reporters are rarely prosecuted, courts cannot create a civil right to sue simply because the criminal law is weakly enforced. 
“We leave it to the legislature with its fact-finding power to determine whether civil liability is appropriate,” Justice Paul Anderson wrote in a position adopted by a majority of the justices. 
The result is a system where the strongest legal motivators for compliance  civil liability and the threat of damages  simply don’t exist. 
Maye Quade said she is studying changes the Legislature can make this session, beginning in February. 
She is asking Senate research staff to begin looking into where the gap is occurring in the law. 
“Honestly, we should have looked at it before,” she said. 
“These victim survivors coming forward and sharing their stories  it would just be wrong to not respond to that.” 
Prosecutors in St. 
Louis County, where Duluth is located, said the church community’s lack of cooperation was a major factor in the delay in bringing charges against Massie. 
Yet none of the preachers have been charged for failing to report the abuse, even though clergy are mandatory reporters under state law. 
Kimberly Lowe, a lawyer for the church, said its preachers are unpaid. 
She said this raises questions as to whether they are subject to the mandatory reporting law, which specifically cites clergy “employees.” 
A prosecutor in the case said his office and police decided instead to try to “educate” church leaders about their legal responsibility to report sexual abuse. 
In general, holding people accountable for violating the mandatory reporting statute is challenging, said Robert Small, executive director of the Minnesota County Attorneys Association, which represents county prosecutors across the state. 
To convict someone, prosecutors must prove the person knew or had reason to believe the child was neglected or sexually abused. 
In the cases where people in Minnesota have been convicted, the penalties were often minor. 
In one case in 2022, a police officer in Wright County was convicted of a misdemeanor after a 14-year-old told him and others she’d been molested and he didn’t report it. 
He was sentenced to one day of probation and a suspended jail sentence, meaning he didn’t have to serve any time. 
Victor Vieth, a former prosecutor who now trains child-abuse investigators nationwide and is based in Minnesota, said it’s difficult to know how often mandated reporters stay silent. 
Many victims delay disclosure for years, and, by then, the three-year statute of limitations usually prevents prosecuting the mandatory reporter who failed to report. 
When failures do surface, he said prosecutors often face a catch-22. 
The mandated reporter who didn’t report may have critical evidence, and prosecutors may decide they need their cooperation more than they need a low-level conviction for failing to report. 
But mandatory reporting laws have been on the books nationwide since the 1960s. 
Over the past half-century, reporting duties have been embedded across American life, in schools, hospitals, churches and child care centers, and training on the obligation to report suspected abuse is now routine  often required as a condition of employment or licensure. 
Every state has its own laws to comply with the federal legislation passed in the 1970s that provided funding and guidance for protecting children, said Toby Briggs, co-founder of Simple Learning Systems, a California-based company that creates training software for mandatory reporting. 
Briggs said he doesn’t see a lot of cases for failure to report, but high-profile lawsuits have led to stricter rules and more required training for mandatory reporters. 
“You have these huge, high-profile examples like Boy Scouts and Catholic Church that have been sued and that did not train their folks and the financial cost is enormous,” he said. 
A few states, including Washington, let victims sue people or institutions if they fail to report abuse and the harm continues. 
This pushes schools and hospitals to train workers better and thoroughly investigate reports. 
Because Minnesota doesn’t allow those civil suits, the state hasn’t seen the same attention to the issue, said Jeff Anderson, one of the nation’s most prominent clergy-abuse attorneys, who is based in St. 
Paul. 
He described the statute as “a tool nobody uses” and said he believes mandated reporters know there is almost no chance of criminal or civil accountability if they stay silent. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.7%Andy Mannix: 3.1%ProPublica: 2.9%Confirmation Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.4%ProPublica: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.9%Andy Mannix: 2.9%ProPublica: 2.6%Availability Heuristic11.9%This article: 2.6%Andy Mannix: 0.9%ProPublica: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.6%This article: 0.8%Andy Mannix: 0.6%ProPublica: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.5%ProPublica: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Andy Mannix: 4.9%ProPublica: 6.8%Framing Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.4%ProPublica: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 9.3%Andy Mannix: 1.0%ProPublica: 0.6%Status Quo Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.1%ProPublica: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Andy Mannix: 0.4%ProPublica: 0.8%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 5.9%Andy Mannix: 0.7%ProPublica: 0.9%Pessimism Bias5.9%This article: 20.3%Andy Mannix: 10.6%ProPublica: 8.2%Negativity Bias20.3%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 2.2%ProPublica: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Andy Mannix: 1.0%ProPublica: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error2.0%This article: 1.8%Andy Mannix: 0.5%ProPublica: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 1.7%ProPublica: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.5%ProPublica: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.4%ProPublica: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.1%ProPublica: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.0%ProPublica: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Andy Mannix: 0.4%ProPublica: 0.8%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.4%ProPublica: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.0%ProPublica: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.4%ProPublica: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.1%ProPublica: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.1%Andy Mannix: 3.2%ProPublica: 3.8%Appeal to Authority17.1%This article: 4.7%Andy Mannix: 0.8%ProPublica: 0.9%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.1%ProPublica: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.0%ProPublica: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Andy Mannix: 2.1%ProPublica: 2.8%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.3%ProPublica: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.2%ProPublica: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.6%Andy Mannix: 3.9%ProPublica: 4.4%Appeal to Emotion1.6%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.4%ProPublica: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.4%Andy Mannix: 3.1%ProPublica: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.4%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.1%ProPublica: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.9%ProPublica: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.2%ProPublica: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.3%ProPublica: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.2%Andy Mannix: 3.6%ProPublica: 2.0%Anecdotal10.2%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.3%ProPublica: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.7%Andy Mannix: 1.0%ProPublica: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.7%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.0%ProPublica: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.0%ProPublica: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.0%ProPublica: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.7%Andy Mannix: 1.0%ProPublica: 0.3%Special Pleading1.7%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.1%ProPublica: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.7%Andy Mannix: 0.7%ProPublica: 1.3%Unattributed Quote8.7%This article: 1.4%Andy Mannix: 1.3%ProPublica: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 11.6%Andy Mannix: 2.0%ProPublica: 2.6%Biased Writer Voice11.6%This article: 7.0%Andy Mannix: 1.9%ProPublica: 0.8%Indoctrination7.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.0%ProPublica: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Mannix: 0.0%ProPublica: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Andy Mannix: 0.2%ProPublica: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.9%

1247 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers39%attributed speech764writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageErin Maye Quade • 40 words • 100.0% coverageErin Maye Quade • 18 words • 100.0% coverageErin Maye Quade • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageDaryl Bruckelmyer • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Anderson • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageErin Maye Quade • 16 words • 0.0% coverageErin Maye Quade • 18 words • 0.0% coverageErin Maye Quade • 10 words • 0.0% coverageErin Maye Quade • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKimberly Lowe • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKimberly Lowe • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Small • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageVictor Vieth • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageVictor Vieth • 11 words • 0.0% coverageVictor Vieth • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageToby Briggs • 42 words • 100.0% coverageToby Briggs • 28 words • 0.0% coverageToby Briggs • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJeff Anderson • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJeff Anderson • 30 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jeff Anderson

100%flagged-word coverage
63 attributed words13% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Unattributed Quote+37.3 ptsWriter: 10.3%Jeff Anderson: 47.6%47.6%Biased Writer Voice-19.0 ptsWriter: 19.0%Jeff Anderson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.