Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daryl Bruckelmyer results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 663 hits. Analysis detected 4,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,242 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (31,254 of 35,635 keywords). This Daryl Bruckelmyer is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Daryl Bruckelmyer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
13%Daryl Bruckelmyer (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,242
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

12% percentile
025507510012.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate