Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vexcel Data results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,607 of 28,364 speakers). This Vexcel Data is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Vexcel Data
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510083.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos