Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanessa Romo results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 364 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 72.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,471 of 26,730 speakers). This Vanessa Romo is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Vanessa Romo
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.5% percentile
72.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos