Speaker summary
65%3 analyzed articles/videos194.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanessa Friedman results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Representativeness Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 35.5% saturation with 79.123 hits. Analysis detected 578.852 faulty-reasoning hits from 194.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,933 of 28,138 speakers). This Vanessa Friedman is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Vanessa Friedman
Speaker details
Total words: 194.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.1% percentile
14.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos194.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate