Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Valmaine Toki results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 167.583 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (18,514 of 26,884 speakers). This Valmaine Toki is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Valmaine Toki
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
19.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.7%16.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.3%18.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos