Speaker summary
86%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Valentina Giuffra results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 49.5 hits. Analysis detected 198 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of 80% (5,870 of 28,364 speakers). This Valentina Giuffra is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Valentina Giuffra
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.3% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos