Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Upham results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 67.7% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 101 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,008 of 28,364 speakers). This Upham is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Upham
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
32.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 67.7%67.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.3%32.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.2%24.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 67.7%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos