Speaker summary
⁠36%2 analyzed articles/videos36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University of Michigan results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 24 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,036 of 28,364 speakers). This University of Michigan is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
University of Michigan
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos