Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video17 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University of California at San Diego results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 85 faulty-reasoning hits from 17 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,502 of 28,364 speakers). This University of California at San Diego is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
University of California at San Diego
Speaker details
Total words: 17
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510084.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos17 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos