Speaker summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos99 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Central Command (CENTCOM) results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 271 faulty-reasoning hits from 99 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,230 of 28,364 speakers). This United States Central Command (CENTCOM) is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
United States Central Command (CENTCOM)
Speaker details
Total words: 99
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
20.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos99 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.3%19.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Burden of Proof: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos