Speaker summary
51%6 analyzed articles/videos99 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ukrainian officials results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 162 faulty-reasoning hits from 99 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 20.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (18,818 of 28,364 speakers). This Ukrainian officials is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Ukrainian officials

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
20.9% BS Score6 analyzed videos99 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate