Speaker summary
⁠52%2 analyzed articles/videos9.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UC Berkeley results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 81.3% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 13 faulty-reasoning hits from 9.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 81.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,133 of 28,364 speakers). This UC Berkeley is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
UC Berkeley
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 9.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.9% percentile
81.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos9.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 81.3%81.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 81.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos