Speaker summary
⁠56%5 analyzed articles/videos107.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. Department of Homeland Security results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 61.5% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 184 faulty-reasoning hits from 107.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 59.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,116 of 28,364 speakers). This U.S. Department of Homeland Security is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
59.5% BS Score5 analyzed videos107.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.6%75.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 41.5%41.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 41.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos