Speaker summary
⁠59%2 analyzed articles/videos57.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. Attorney Thomas C. Albus results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 57.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,427 of 28,364 speakers). This U.S. Attorney Thomas C. Albus is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
U.S. Attorney Thomas C. Albus
Speaker details
Total words: 57.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
57.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos57.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 42.3%42.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos