Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These u/Ava_Strange results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 201.415 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,778 of 28,364 speakers). This u/Ava_Strange is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
u/Ava_Strange
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
27.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 43.5%43.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 43.5%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos