Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video85.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tracy Whelpley results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 285 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,969 of 28,364 speakers). This Tracy Whelpley is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Tracy Whelpley
Speaker details
Total words: 85.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
35.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.3%19.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos