Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video109.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tracy Stone-Manning results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 68.2% saturation with 74.625 hits. Analysis detected 349.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 109.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,617 of 28,364 speakers). This Tracy Stone-Manning is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Tracy Stone-Manning
Speaker details
Total words: 109.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
37.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos109.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 72.6%72.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 68.2%68.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 36.3%36.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.3%36.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 72.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 68.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos