Speaker summary
48%5 analyzed articles/videos222.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Toshimitsu Motegi results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 88.527 hits. Analysis detected 556.711 faulty-reasoning hits from 222.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (21,803 of 26,730 speakers). This Toshimitsu Motegi is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.4% percentile
13.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos222.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.4%15.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate