Japan to raise visa fees for foreign nationals in first revision in 48 years 21%

By JIJI0%

6/20/2026, 5:04:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 410 faulty-reasoning hits from 422 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (16,264 of 20,367 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the article peer group.

The government has decided to raise the fees for visas for foreign nationals by revising a related Cabinet order. 
The decision, made at a Cabinet meeting Friday, marks the first revision of the visa fees in 48 years, since 1978. 
The fee will be increased from the current ¥3,000 to ¥15,000 for a single-entry visa and from ¥6,000 to ¥30,000 for a multiple-entry visa. 
The new fees will apply to applications submitted on or after July 1. 
“The current visa fee was set in 1978, and we have recently revised it to reflect inflation and exchange rate fluctuations since then,“ Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi told a news conference Friday. 
“We made this decision after carefully considering various factors, and we do not anticipate that it will have an immediate impact on inbound tourism,” he added. 
Last month, the Upper House enacted a bill to raise visa-related fees for foreign nationals by up to 30 times the current levels. 
The increase will enable the government to use the additional revenue to help cover the administrative costs of managing the country’s growing foreign population. 
The bill cleared the Lower House in April. 
Prior to the bill’s enactment, the statutory upper limit for fees to change residency statuses or extend a period of stay was ¥10,000 ($63), while the cap for permanent residency applications was also set at ¥10,000. 
Under the revision, those ceilings will be raised to ¥100,000 and ¥300,000, respectively. 
Under the revised framework, actual fees are set by Cabinet orders within the new statutory limits. 
The government has proposed raising fees for residency status changes and stay extensions from the current range of ¥5,500 to ¥6,000 to between ¥10,000 and ¥70,000, while fees for permanent residency applications would increase from ¥10,000 to ¥200,000. 
The government is aiming to implement the changes sometime before the end of the next fiscal year on March 31, 2027. 
The government plans to use the additional revenue for processing Japan’s growing foreign resident population  which reached a record 4.13 million as of the end of 2025  as well as expanding Japanese-language programs and strengthening measures against illegal overstayers. 
It has justified the fee hikes by arguing that Japan must align visa- and residency-related charges more closely with those of Western countries in order to build a more robust immigration system. 
Visa renewal fees, for example, are about $420 to $470 in the United States and €93 ($107) to €98 in Germany. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%JIJI: 2.2%The Japan Times: 3.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%JIJI: 2.5%The Japan Times: 1.9%Anchoring Bias8.1%This article: 5.0%JIJI: 2.6%The Japan Times: 4.7%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 7.6%JIJI: 1.6%The Japan Times: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic7.6%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.6%The Japan Times: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 8.2%The Japan Times: 14.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 9.0%JIJI: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Loss Aversion9.0%This article: 7.6%JIJI: 1.7%The Japan Times: 1.3%Status Quo Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%JIJI: 4.4%The Japan Times: 4.7%Optimism Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 2.9%The Japan Times: 3.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%JIJI: 5.0%The Japan Times: 11.5%Negativity Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.7%The Japan Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.8%The Japan Times: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.6%The Japan Times: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.7%JIJI: 1.3%The Japan Times: 2.2%Recency Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 21.3%JIJI: 5.7%The Japan Times: 5.6%Appeal to Authority21.3%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.9%The Japan Times: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.7%The Japan Times: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 1.4%The Japan Times: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.7%JIJI: 4.0%The Japan Times: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion9.7%This article: 7.6%JIJI: 1.3%The Japan Times: 0.9%Begging the Question7.6%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 1.9%The Japan Times: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.1%The Japan Times: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 2.9%The Japan Times: 3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 2.9%The Japan Times: 4.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 2.1%The Japan Times: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 4.7%The Japan Times: 9.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 2.1%The Japan Times: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JIJI: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

422 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker14%attributed speech364writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageToshimitsu Motegi • 32 words • 0.0% coverageToshimitsu Motegi • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Toshimitsu Motegi

100%flagged-word coverage
58 attributed words100% of attributed speech52% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.