Speaker summary
ā 33%1 analyzed article/video146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Torsten Slok results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 43.4% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 526 faulty-reasoning hits from 146 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.8% and a BS Rank of ā 36% (18,362 of 28,364 speakers). This Torsten Slok is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Torsten Slok
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 36%Torsten Slok (selected)22%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 146
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
21.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos146 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.7%18.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos