Speaker summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 358.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tori Schafer results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , In-Group Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 159.693 hits . Analysis detected 1,363.92 faulty-reasoning hits from 358.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (21,706 of 28,364 speakers). This Tori Schafer is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Tori Schafer
Speaker details
Total words: 358.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 15.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos358.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 35.7% 35.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 38.7% 38.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 29.5% 29.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 19.2% 19.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 19.6% 19.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 22.0% 22.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 19.2% 19.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 26.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst