Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video99.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Peterson results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 60.557 hits. Analysis detected 302.502 faulty-reasoning hits from 99.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,189 of 28,364 speakers). This Tony Peterson is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Tony Peterson
Speaker details
Total words: 99.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
24.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos99.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos