Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video42.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Marichi results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 62.5% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 67 faulty-reasoning hits from 42.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,818 of 28,364 speakers). This Tony Marichi is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Tony Marichi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 42.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.3% percentile
40.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos42.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 62.5%62.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.8%32.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 62.5%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos