Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tomas Philipson results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,343 of 28,364 speakers). This Tomas Philipson is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Tomas Philipson
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos27 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos