Author summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Hogberg results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 2,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,478 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,287 of 6,628 authors). This David Hogberg is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. David Hogberg
Author details
Total words: 2,478
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.5%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst