Speaker summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos59 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Karako results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 67.8% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 59 faulty-reasoning hits from 59 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (9,522 of 26,891 speakers). This Tom Karako is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Tom Karako
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 59
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos59 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 67.8%67.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.2%32.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 67.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos