Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video79.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Jones results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 188 faulty-reasoning hits from 79.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,250 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Jones is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Tom Jones
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠47%Tom Jones (selected)29%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 79.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.2% percentile
28.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos79.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.3%22.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos