Author summary
â 39% 1 analyzed article/video 825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vermont Public results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 200 hits . Analysis detected 1,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,475 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of â 44% (3,576 of 6,363 authors). This Vermont Public is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Vermont Public
Author details
Total words: 2,475
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst