Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Ginsburg results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 196.397 faulty-reasoning hits from 121 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,813 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Ginsburg is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Tom Ginsburg
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠31%Tom Ginsburg (selected)19%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 121
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.1% percentile
19.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos121 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 24.5%24.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos