Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Dundon results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 180 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,614 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Dundon is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Tom Dundon
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos