Author summary
69%1 analyzed article/video1,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremiah Hayden results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 896 hits. Analysis detected 3,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,573 of 6,628 authors). This Jeremiah Hayden is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Jeremiah Hayden
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
62%Jeremiah Hayden (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,504
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 25.6%25.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Red Herring: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos